What if I disagree with a RICS Standards Check finding?

The tool is advisory — you are never forced to act on a finding. If a finding does not apply to the specific property, note your reasoning in the relevant section and leave it unresolved. The run history records that the check was completed; whether and how you address each finding remains your professional judgement.

Does the RICS Standards Check work for listed buildings and pre-1919 properties?

Yes. Compliance rules are applied against the RICS Home Survey Standard regardless of property type. For listed buildings and pre-1919 properties, the check is particularly useful for surfacing underpopulated sections on higher-risk elements — damp, structural movement, historic fabric — where thin commentary is more likely to draw a future complaint. Surveyor judgement on specialist referrals for heritage properties remains essential.

Live · RICS Standards Check · whole-report pass

Home Survey Standard 1st ed. Severity-graded Run history

RICS Standards Check · compliance pass

One RICS compliance pass. Catches every gap before you sign.

A whole-report compliance pass against the RICS Home Survey Standard, 1st edition. Click run, get back a prioritised list of findings: missing content, ratings that don't match the language used, structural gaps, ambiguous wording. Every finding deep-links to the section to fix. You remain the surveyor of record — the check is advisory, not a gate.

Get the toolkit — Free See the four-axis pass

Aligned with RICS HSS Severity-graded Run history per report Advisory · never gates

Compliance score

82% · 1 high · 1 medium · 1 low

~30 sec

Whole-report scan

4 axes

Content · Ratings · Structure · Language

Severity tiers

~30s

Per full pass

L2 + L3

Level-aware grading

Four-axis pass

Content · Ratings · Structure · Language

Axis 1

Content depth

Every populated section is graded for adequate depth at the chosen level. Stub sections, single-line summaries on complex elements and missing risk commentary are surfaced.

Axis 2

Rating alignment

Condition ratings are cross-checked against the language of the commentary. A rating 3 with no "urgent" or "remedial" language — or a rating 1 alongside descriptions of significant defects — is flagged.

Axis 3

Structural completeness

Required sections for the report level are confirmed present. Level 2 expects sections A through K; Level 3 expects sections A through N including energy and remedial cost commentary.

Axis 4

Language & scope

First-person language, definitive opinions on specialist matters and scope-creep beyond the chosen survey level are flagged. The check keeps your wording observational and within remit.

Example finding

A typical critical: missing evidence.

One of the most common findings: an element rated 2 or 3 with no supporting photo. The pass surfaces it with the section, the rating and a one-tap "Attach photo" jump straight into the gallery filtered to that element. Fix it in seconds, not minutes.

●Severity-graded — critical, major, minor
●Deep-links to the section to fix
●One-click action where possible
●Run history per report

Missing evidence warning card — D3 Rainwater goods has rating 2 but no supporting photo; chips show 'D3 Rainwater goods' and 'Rating 2'; primary call-to-action is Attach photo

Where it fits

The last step before you sign.

Run Otto auto-mode to draft the report. Edit in the Level 2 or Level 3 report writer. Polish individual paragraphs with AI rewrite. Then run RICS Standards Check as the final pass — it scans the whole report in one go, ranks findings by severity and links each one back to the section to fix. Sign and export the branded PDF when you are happy.

~30s

Typical run time for a full Level 2 or Level 3 report

3 severities

Critical, major, minor — prioritise what to fix first

Run history

Every check stored against the report — track improvements over time

Walk-through

A Level 2 compliance pass in six minutes.

Marcus, a residential surveyor, finishes editing his Level 2 report on a 1930s semi-detached. He has used Otto auto-mode to draft the report and spent twenty minutes reviewing and adjusting the commentary. Before exporting the PDF, he runs RICS Standards Check.

Click Run — whole-report scan in 30 seconds

Marcus opens the Standards Check panel from the report toolbar. The scan covers all populated sections against the RICS Home Survey Standard. A compliance score appears — 78% — with three findings listed in priority order.

Critical: D3 Rainwater goods — rating 2, no supporting photo

The check detects an element rated 2 with no attached photograph. Marcus taps the deep-link; the image gallery opens pre-filtered to D3. He attaches the photo taken on site. Finding cleared in under a minute.

Major: Section H legal matters — single-line stub

Section H is a single sentence — the check flags it as underpopulated for a Level 2 report on a pre-1945 property. Marcus expands the commentary with a note about the absence of visible boundary markers and a referral to the client's solicitor.

Minor: F2 Gas installation — first-person advisory language

A minor finding flags "I recommend" in Section F2 — first-person advisory language that goes beyond observational scope. Marcus rewrites the sentence: "The installation should be inspected by a Gas Safe registered engineer before exchange." Finding resolved.

Re-run: 100% — export and deliver

Marcus re-runs the check. All three findings resolved; compliance score 100%. He exports the branded PDF and delivers to the client. Total time from first run to clean pass: six minutes.

How it compares

Standards Check vs. manual QA.

The check does in 30 seconds what a manual QA process does in 15–20 minutes — and catches things a self-review typically misses.

Capability	RICS Standards Check	Manual QA checklist	No QA step
Time per report	~30 seconds	15–20 minutes	—
Catches rating / comment contradictions	Yes	Sometimes	No
Flags missing supporting photos	Yes	If checklist includes it	No
Level-aware (Level 2 vs Level 3 scope)	Yes, automatic	Only with two checklists	No
Deep-links to section to fix	Yes	No	No
Run history stored per report	Yes	Manual record only	No
Catches out-of-scope language	Yes	Requires trained reviewer	No
Aligned with RICS HSS, 1st edition	Yes, maintained	Only if you update it	No

How it works

Not keyword matching. Meaning analysis.

A keyword-based checker catches "I recommend" but misses "it would be advisable to arrange." It matches "condition 3" but cannot read whether Section B is tonally consistent with that element finding. The RICS Standards Check analyses the meaning of your commentary — which is why it catches contradictions and scope issues that a checklist or word-search cannot.

Reads the whole report at once

Every populated section is analysed together — not section by section in isolation. Cross-section contradictions (Section B vs element ratings, Section H vs missing referrals) are only detectable when the report is read as a complete document.

Understands ratings in context

A condition 2 rating is not inherently a problem — but paired with commentary describing "visible cracking to external masonry" and no specialist referral, it becomes a major finding. The check reads each rating alongside its commentary, not in isolation.

Runs on your secure account

Analysis runs entirely within Home.co.uk's surveyor infrastructure. Your report content is never shared with third parties and is not used to improve AI systems outside your account. The same privacy protections apply as for Otto auto-mode and AI Dictation.

Severity grading

Three priorities. No noise.

Every finding is graded so you know what to deal with first and what to ignore on a tight job.

Critical

Compliance gap or contradiction

A required section is missing, a condition rating directly contradicts the commentary, or wording goes beyond the surveyor's remit at this level. Fix before sign-off.

Major

Important but not blocking

A section is significantly thin for the chosen level, a known risk for the property type is not addressed, or a finding from one section is not reflected in the overall opinion. Worth addressing before delivery.

Minor

Polish & consistency

Optional fields populated inconsistently, single sentences that could be expanded, or stylistic variations between sections. Nice-to-have improvements.

Section B alignment

The compliance gap most surveyors don't spot until it's too late.

Section B's overall condition summary must not contradict the element findings. If any element carries a condition rating 3, the summary cannot imply the property is generally sound. Yet it is remarkably easy to draft Section B early, run Otto auto-mode, then miss that a later finding has changed the picture.

The RICS Standards Check cross-validates the Section B overall summary text against the highest condition ratings across all elements before you sign. Any mismatch — a condition 3 damp finding alongside a Section B summary that makes no mention of urgent works — is flagged as a critical finding. It is one of the most common triggers for RICS complaint proceedings and professional indemnity claims.

For Level 3 Building Survey reports the stakes are higher still: Section B must also confirm that priority items and remedial cost estimates are present whenever the element commentary warrants them. The check validates all three layers automatically.

What the check validates in Section B

● Summary vs. worst rating — Section B language must not imply a generally sound property if any element is condition 3
● Priority items populated — any condition 3 finding in Sections D–G should be referenced in the Section B priority list
● Overall tone consistency — checks that "generally satisfactory" language is not used when multiple condition 2 findings are present
● Level 3 only — remedial cost coverage — flags if no cost estimate or cost range appears where element commentary implies significant remedial works

Critical finding example

D4 Damp-proof course rated condition 3 — "Rising damp evident to front elevation. Specialist investigation and remediation required urgently."

Section B summary reads: "The property is generally in a reasonable condition for its age and type."

Mismatch flagged as critical. Section B summary must acknowledge the urgent remediation requirement.

Documented QA process

A timestamped record for every report you deliver.

Every check run is stored against the report — with a timestamp, the findings list and the final compliance score. If a complaint is ever raised against a delivered survey, you can show that a documented QA step was completed before sign-off: when it ran, what it found and what you addressed.

For sole traders and small practices without a formal peer-review process, the run history is a practical substitute — one that professional indemnity underwriters increasingly expect to see as part of a documented quality management system.

●Timestamp per check — date, time and report version
●Full findings list retained, including resolved items
●Compliance score tracked across successive runs
●Private to your firm — never visible to third parties

Run history — 14 Maple Crescent, Bristol

Run 3 — Final 100%

28 Apr 2026 · 14:22 · All findings resolved · PDF exported

Run 2 — Draft review 91%

28 Apr 2026 · 13:47 · 1 minor · F2 first-person language

Run 1 — First pass 78%

28 Apr 2026 · 12:11 · 1 critical · 1 major · 1 minor

Run history is private to your firm and retained against the report indefinitely — available if needed for PI correspondence.

Getting started

Up and running in five minutes.

The Standards Check is built into the report editor — no separate tool to open or install. Here is how to run your first pass.

Open a report

Open the Standards Check panel

Click the Standards Check icon in the report toolbar. The panel opens on the right — no page navigation, no separate window.

Click Run

The check scans every populated section against the RICS Home Survey Standard. A compliance score and prioritised findings list appear in about 30 seconds.

Address findings

Each finding deep-links to the section to fix. Tap the link, make the change, return to the panel. Start with critical findings, then major, then minor.

Re-run and sign off

Run the check again to confirm all critical and major findings are cleared. When satisfied, export the branded PDF. Run history is saved automatically.

Get the toolkit — Free

Who uses it

Built for RICS-registered surveying professionals.

RICS Standards Check is used by residential and building surveyors of every practice size — from sole traders to regional panel firms with multiple surveyors.

Residential surveyors on panel

High-volume panel work leaves little time for manual QA. The check runs in 30 seconds on every report — catching rating contradictions and missing photos before they reach the client.

Chartered Building Surveyors (Level 3)

Level 3 reports carry higher professional risk and more required sections. The check confirms that energy commentary, remedial cost estimates and specialist referrals are all present before you sign.

Small practices and sole traders

Without a colleague to peer-review, the Standards Check acts as a second pair of eyes on every section — covering content depth, ratings, structure and language across the whole report.

Practice principals managing quality

Principals use run history to monitor compliance improvements over time, identify sections that repeatedly need attention, and demonstrate a documented QA process to professional indemnity insurers.

Surveyors moving to a new report format

Transitioning from a Word template or another platform? The check validates that your reports meet RICS structural and content requirements from the very first report you produce in the new format.

PI-conscious professionals

Rating-comment contradictions, missing specialist referrals and out-of-scope opinions are the most common triggers of surveyor complaints. The Standards Check flags all three before delivery — every time.

APC candidates

Completing the Standards Check on every report during your APC training period builds a timestamped QA record across your entire case study period. When writing your competency statement on RICS Home Survey, that run history is direct, verifiable evidence that your reports were produced to the RICS Home Survey Standard consistently throughout your training — and demonstrates systematic QA practice to your supervisor and assessors.

What makes it different

Ten things a manual checklist cannot do.

Level-aware rules — automatic

Level 2 HomeBuyer scope (sections A–K) and Level 3 Building Survey scope (sections A–N, including energy and remedial cost commentary) are graded by different rules. The check detects the report level and applies the correct rule set without you selecting anything.

Cross-section validation — Section B vs D–G

The check reads condition ratings across every populated element (D1–G3) and compares them against your Section B overall summary. A condition 3 rating anywhere in the element sections will flag Section B language that implies the property is generally sound — before you sign.

Missing-photo detection

Every element rated condition 2 or 3 is checked for at least one supporting photograph. Flagged elements get a one-click jump to the image gallery, pre-filtered to that element, so you can attach the site photo in seconds.

Specialist referral detection

The check scans sections covering active damp, structural movement, potentially asbestos-containing materials, and electrical or gas installations for referral language. Absent referrals on high-risk elements are flagged — more strictly for Level 3 than Level 2.

Out-of-scope language detection

First-person advisory constructions — "I recommend", "I advise" — overstep the observational remit of a RICS survey and are flagged. The check keeps your wording observational and within the scope of the chosen survey level before the report leaves your account.

Built into the report editor

No separate tool to open, no tab-switching, no copy-paste. The Standards Check panel opens from the report toolbar and reads the live report content — whatever is entered at that moment. Run it partway through drafting or as the final step before sign-off.

30-second whole-report scan

A full Level 2 or Level 3 report is analysed in approximately 30 seconds. At that speed, running the check twice — once mid-draft and once before sign-off — adds under a minute to the overall job time.

Severity-graded output — no noise

Every finding is graded critical, major or minor. Critical findings are gaps or contradictions that must be addressed before sign-off; minor findings are optional polish. You prioritise: the tool does not bury urgent issues in a flat list.

Run history — timestamped audit trail

Every check run is stored against the report with a timestamp, the full findings list and the final compliance score. The history is retained indefinitely — available as a documented QA record if a complaint is ever raised against a delivered survey.

Always aligned with the RICS Home Survey Standard

The compliance rules are maintained against the RICS HSS, 1st edition, and updated whenever RICS publishes formal guidance changes. No manual checklist to update and no risk of running an outdated QA process.

What it catches most

The five most common RICS compliance failures.

These are the findings the Standards Check flags most often — recurring compliance gaps that appear regardless of practice size, survey level or property type.

Most frequent

Section B summary contradicts element condition ratings

A condition 3 element in Sections D–G — rising damp, structural movement, roof coverings — alongside a Section B summary that describes the property as "generally sound" or "in reasonable condition." This is the most common trigger for RICS complaints panel proceedings. The check cross-validates Section B language against the highest condition rating across all populated elements and flags any mismatch as critical.

Critical

Rated element with no supporting photograph

An element rated condition 2 or 3 with no photograph attached to support the finding. In the absence of supporting evidence, a rating can be challenged far more easily in a complaint. The check flags every rated element where no photo is present — a one-click jump takes you directly to the image gallery pre-filtered to that element so you can attach the site photo in seconds.

Major

Missing specialist referral on a high-risk element

Active damp, structural movement, potentially asbestos-containing materials and electrical or gas installations typically require a referral to a specialist — yet it is easy to describe the defect without explicitly saying so. The check looks for referral language in the relevant section and flags its absence. Level 3 reports are graded more strictly than Level 2 on this point.

Major

Section underpopulated for the chosen survey level

A single sentence — or no text at all — in a section the RICS Home Survey Standard requires to be substantively addressed for the survey level. This appears most often in Section H (legal and statutory matters) and Section I (risks) on Level 2 reports, and in Sections K–N on Level 3 reports where energy and remedial cost commentary is required. The check grades each section against the expected depth for the chosen level.

Minor

First-person advisory language in element sections

Phrases like "I recommend" or "I advise" in element commentary overstep the surveyor's observational remit at Level 2 and Level 3. RICS-compliant language is observational — "the installation should be inspected by a Gas Safe registered engineer" rather than "I recommend you arrange a Gas Safe inspection." The check flags first-person advisory constructions across all element sections so you can rewrite before sign-off.

FAQ

Common questions

What does the RICS Standards Check actually check?

It analyses your report against the RICS Home Survey Standard, 1st edition, across four axes: content depth (is each section populated to the right depth for the chosen level?), rating alignment (do the condition ratings match the language used in the commentary?), structural completeness (are the required sections present for a Level 2 or Level 3 report?) and language and scope (are findings observational and within the surveyor's remit?). Findings are returned with severity grading (critical, major, minor) and a deep link to the section to fix.

Does it work on Level 2 and Level 3 reports?

Yes. The check is level-aware. Level 2 reports are graded against HomeBuyer Report scope and depth — sections A through K. Level 3 reports are graded against Building Survey scope and depth — sections A through N, including energy commentary and remedial cost sections. Section-specific rules adapt automatically based on the survey level chosen.

Can it block a report from being signed off?

No. The check is advisory — you remain the surveyor of record and the final sign-off is yours. Findings are presented as a prioritised list so you can decide which to address. Many firms run the check as the final step before exporting the branded PDF, but the tool never gates delivery.

Is the analysis stored or kept private?

Each run is stored against the report so you can see the history of checks, including timestamps and findings. Reports are private to your firm; nothing is shared with other firms or used to train AI systems. The check runs through Home.co.uk's surveyor AI infrastructure under the same privacy terms as Otto auto-mode.

How is this different from AI rewrite inside the editor?

AI rewrite improves the language of a single sentence or paragraph at your request. RICS Standards Check is a whole-report compliance pass — it does not edit anything; it produces a graded findings list across every populated section. Use rewrite for line-by-line polishing; use the Standards Check at the end to catch anything missing, ambiguous or non-compliant before you sign.

Does the check use my style profile?

No. The Standards Check is deliberately style-agnostic — it grades only against the RICS Home Survey Standard, not against your firm's preferred voice. Your style profile is used by Otto auto-mode and AI rewrite to match your firm's writing voice, while the Standards Check applies a single industry-wide compliance bar.

Does the check flag missing specialist referrals?

Yes, particularly for Level 3 reports. The check looks for elements that typically warrant a specialist referral — including active damp, structural movement, potentially asbestos-containing materials, and electrical or gas installations — and flags cases where no referral language appears in the relevant section. For Level 2, it checks that significant defect findings include a recommendation to seek specialist advice.

Will the check update if RICS publishes new guidance?

Yes. The check is maintained against the RICS Home Survey Standard and updated whenever RICS publishes formal guidance changes. You do not need to update anything — the check in your account always reflects the current standard. Any changes to the rules are noted in the release notes for your firm's account.

Does the RICS Standards Check help reduce professional indemnity risk?

Yes, indirectly. The most common triggers for surveyor complaints and professional indemnity claims are: condition ratings that contradict the commentary, missing specialist referrals on high-risk elements such as active damp, structural movement or electrical installations, and first-person advisory language that oversteps the surveyor's observational remit. The Standards Check flags all three categories before you sign off. Run history also gives you a timestamped audit trail of the QA steps taken — which can be relevant if a complaint is ever raised against a delivered report.

Can I use the check on a report drafted outside Home.co.uk?

Not directly. RICS Standards Check reads the report content as entered in your Home.co.uk editable report — it cannot read an external Word document or PDF. If you have drafted a report in another tool, you can paste the content into the relevant sections of the report editor and then run the check against it.

What if I disagree with a finding?

You are the surveyor of record — the tool is advisory and you are never forced to act on a finding. If you believe a finding is not applicable to the specific property (for example, a specialist referral flag on an element you observed to be in excellent condition), simply note your reasoning in the relevant section and leave the finding unresolved. The run history records the check was completed; whether and how you address each finding remains your professional judgement.

Does the check handle unusual property types — listed buildings, pre-1919 properties, flats in conversion?

The compliance rules are applied against the RICS Home Survey Standard regardless of property type, so the structural and language checks work across all property types. For listed buildings and pre-1919 properties, the check is particularly useful for flagging underpopulated sections on inherently higher-risk elements — damp, structural movement, historic fabric — where thin commentary is more likely to draw a future complaint. The check does not apply listed building or conservation area rules beyond what the RICS HSS requires, so surveyor judgement on specialist referrals for those properties remains essential.

How does the check validate Section B against the element ratings?

Section B's overall condition summary must not contradict the severity of element findings. If any element carries a condition rating 3, the Section B summary cannot use language that implies the property is generally sound or in reasonable order. The check cross-validates the summary text against the highest condition ratings across all elements — D through G. Any mismatch is flagged as a critical finding: it is one of the most common compliance issues RICS complaints panels encounter. For Level 3 reports the check also validates that priority items and remedial cost estimates are present when the element commentary warrants them.

Can I run the RICS Standards Check on a partially completed report?

Yes. You can run the check at any stage of drafting — including on a report that is not yet finished. The check analyses whatever content is populated at that moment and returns findings only for sections that have been started. Unpopulated sections are not flagged as structural gaps during a partial-draft run. Many surveyors run a mid-draft pass to catch rating contradictions or language issues while there is still time to reshape a section, then run a second pass when the report is complete before sign-off.

Does the check flag energy performance commentary gaps in Level 3 Building Survey reports?

Yes. For Level 3 reports, the check validates that energy performance commentary is present in the relevant section — covering the property's general energy efficiency position, any significant thermal deficiencies observed, and whether improvements or specialist assessment are warranted. This is a requirement of the RICS Home Survey Standard for Level 3 scope that is easy to omit under time pressure. The check flags sections where no energy performance discussion appears in a Level 3 report, graded as major if absent entirely.

Can a practice principal use run history to support a quality management system?

Yes. Run history stores a timestamped record of every Standards Check run for every report in the firm's account — including the findings list, compliance score and resolution status. Practice principals can use this to demonstrate a documented, systematic QA process to professional indemnity underwriters who ask how the firm controls report quality, and to satisfy RICS Firm Registration requirements around quality management. Many practices include the Standards Check as a required pre-sign-off step for all reports, with the run history confirming completion.

Should I run the RICS Standards Check on every report or only when I am unsure?

The check is designed for every report — not just ones you are uncertain about. Most surveyors run it once near the end of drafting and again after addressing findings. At roughly 30 seconds per pass, it is practical as a standard final step on every job. Practices that do this consistently build a complete run history for every delivered report — a stronger documented QA position than running the check selectively, and one that professional indemnity underwriters increasingly expect to see.

Is there a compliance score I need to reach before I can export and deliver the report?

No. There is no minimum compliance score required to export the PDF — you can deliver at any score. The score helps you prioritise: 100% means no open findings across all four axes; a score of 85–90% with only minor findings outstanding may be perfectly acceptable on a straightforward job. What matters is that you have reviewed every finding and made a professional judgement on each one. The run history confirms that you completed the check and records your decisions.

Can APC candidates use the RICS Standards Check to support their competency submission?

Yes. Completing the Standards Check on every report during your APC training period builds a timestamped QA record that spans your entire case study period. When compiling your competency statement on RICS Home Survey, the run history is direct, verifiable evidence that your reports were produced to the RICS Home Survey Standard consistently — from your first submission through to final assessment. Many APC supervisors treat a documented standards-check process as a strong indicator of systematic practice and readiness for assessment.

How does run history help a practice demonstrate RICS Firm Registration compliance?

RICS Firm Registration requires firms to maintain a documented quality management system that includes a process for controlling report quality. The Standards Check run history — a timestamped record of every compliance pass on every report, retained indefinitely — is a ready-made component of that QMS. Principals can point to the log to show that a documented, consistent QA step was applied to every report the firm delivered, identify sections that repeatedly need attention for continuous improvement, and satisfy RICS Firm Registration auditors who ask how the practice manages survey quality.

Is the RICS Standards Check endorsed or approved by RICS?

The RICS Standards Check is a Home.co.uk product — it is not an official RICS product and is not endorsed or approved by RICS. The compliance rules it applies are derived from the RICS Home Survey Standard, 1st edition, a published document available to all RICS practitioners. Home.co.uk maintains those rules and updates them whenever RICS publishes formal guidance changes. The tool is designed to help RICS-regulated surveyors produce reports consistent with the HSS requirements — but it does not substitute for your own professional judgement or for reading the RICS HSS directly.

How does the RICS Standards Check differ from a peer review?

A peer review involves a second surveyor reading the report and applying professional judgement. The RICS Standards Check is a systematic, consistent automated pass — it applies the same compliance rules to every report without variation. In practice the two are complementary: the check catches structural gaps, rating contradictions and language issues before the report reaches a peer reviewer; the peer reviewer applies contextual property knowledge that an automated check cannot. For sole traders without access to peer review, the Standards Check is a practical and documented first-line QA measure. For practices that do carry out peer review, the run history supplements the peer review record.

More tools

Explore the rest of the surveyor toolkit

Otto

AI auto-mode RICS report writer

Dictate on-site, upload photos, get a finished, fully-routed Level 2 or Level 3 report in minutes.

Level 2 Report Writer

RICS Home Survey Level 2

Field-by-field RICS Level 2 reports with inline AI suggestions, image gallery, comparables and one-click branded PDF.

Level 3 Report Writer

RICS Building Survey Level 3

Comprehensive Level 3 Building Survey reports with deep technical sections, custom rating scales and AI legal-adviser notes.

Surveyor Comparable Tool

Sold + rental comps in one click

Auto-fetch sold and rental comparables within a 1-mile radius, weighted valuation range, branded PDF appendix for any survey.

Snagging Report Builder

New-build defect tracker

Build professional new-build snagging lists with location-based defect tracking, photos, urgency, status and PDF export.

AI Dictation

Voice-to-fields routing

Speak observations on-site; AI routes every sentence to the correct RICS field with confidence scores and replayable audio.

Image AI

Auto-categorise survey photos

Upload up to 200 photos; vision AI tags each to the right RICS element, rates condition, extracts defects and picks the best 35 for the report.

Style Profile

Your firm's writing fingerprint

Teach the AI to write like your firm — upload past reports, the AI extracts a 25-dimension writing fingerprint and applies it to every future auto-mode report.

Property Viewer

Pre-survey property intelligence

Look up any UK property and instantly see EPC, energy renovation costs, broadband coverage, environmental risks (flood, radon, mining, landfill), invasive plants, sales history and listing status — all in one dashboard.

Property Data Drawer

EPC + risks + comps in one panel

Open the property data drawer in any report to see EPC, environmental risks, listing history and comparables — copy-paste ready.

Standard Phrases

Reusable language library

Personal, firm-wide and industry-preset phrase libraries — insert with one click and use to train AI routing for voice consistency.

View the full toolkit

Free directory listing. Pay-as-you-go toolkit.

Every RICS-regulated surveying firm gets a verified profile, direct bookings from home.co.uk consumers and the surveyor toolkit included with the account. No subscription. No pay-per-lead. No commission on the job. Pay only when you use the premium AI tools.

Claim Your Firm — Free See all tools

2 minute setup · Verified against the RICS register · Trusted UK property platform since 1995